Apples to Apples Official Rules: Judging & Card Selection

Yes, the judge selects the one card they think is best described by the green apple card.

Many players assume there is a tie-breaking mechanism when two cards seem equally good, but the rules place all final authority in the judge.

Yes, according to the Apples to Apples Official Rulebook, the judge has the sole discretion to select the winning card.

Apples to Apples Official Rules [edition not specified]

Expertise: Board game rules expert. | Verification: Cross-referenced official rulebook text regarding judge selection and player interaction. | Purpose: Resolve the #1 dispute regarding judge subjectivity and tie-breaking in Apples to Apples.
Key Insight: To avoid arguments, establish that the judge's decision is final before the first green card is turned.

These rules correspond to the UK edition of Apples to Apples.

Official Rule Breakdown

Regarding the selection of cards that seem equally strong, the official rules state that the judge turns over each red apple card, reads it aloud, and then selects the one he or she thinks is best described by the word on the green apple card. While players are encouraged to use 'table talk' and lobbying to convince the judge, the judge's choice is final. The rules also note that it is acceptable to play a red apple card that isn't a perfect fit, as judges often prioritise…

Step-by-Step

  1. Step 1: The judge picks a green apple card from the top of the stack and reads it aloud.
  2. Step 2: Players quickly choose a red apple card from their hand that is best described by the green card.
  3. Step 3: Players place their red apple cards face down on the table.
  4. Step 4: The judge mixes the red apple cards so no one knows which card belongs to whom.
  5. Step 5: The judge turns over each red apple card and reads it aloud.
  6. Step 6: The judge selects the single red apple card they believe is best described by the green card.

Example Play Situation

Alice plays 'Charging Rhinos' for the green card 'Dainty'. Bob plays 'Tiny Kittens'. Even though both are valid, the judge decides Bob's card is more humorous and awards him the green apple card.

Apples to Apples rules rule situation

House Rules

[HOUSE RULE] Some groups implement a 'split vote' where if two cards are truly identical in quality, the judge awards a green apple card to both players, though this is not an official rule.

Common Misconceptions

  • The rules require a perfect literal match for a card to be valid.
  • If two cards are equally good, the judge must split the win.
  • Players can vote on which card the judge should pick.

Quick Reference

You CanYou Cannot
You can use 'table talk' to lobby the judgeYou cannot force the judge to pick a specific card
You can play creative or humorous cardsYou cannot look at other players' red apple cards once they are face down
You can play cards that aren't a perfect fit

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the official rule for selecting a winner in Apples to Apples?
The judge selects the one red apple card they feel is best described by the green card.
Can I lobby the judge to pick my card if it's a tie?
Yes, lobbying and 'table talk' are encouraged to help convince the judge.
What if I play a card that isn't a perfect fit?
It is okay; judges often pick the most creative or humorous response.
Is it allowed to play two cards at once in a standard round?
No, players choose one red apple card from their hand per round.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *